Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Orzhov Pixie | szach | 7-7 | None |
5 Color Legends , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Midrange , Esper Oculus , Esper Pixie , Golgari Demons , Golgari Graveyard , Golgari Midrange , Jund Midrange , Mono Black
Hostile Investigator ranks #4003 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 78%).
Black average: 49.9%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Hostile Investigator is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 1.57 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 4 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.9%. Hostile Investigator has a win rate of 56.5%, making it 18.1% better than other 4-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tranquil Frillback | Creature — Dinosaur | 5 | 48.7% | 0 |
Mosswood Dreadknight | Creature — Human Knight // Sorcery — Adventure | 5 | 46.8% | 0 |
Tear Asunder | Instant | 5 | 46.8% | 0 |
Harvester of Misery | Creature — Spirit | 6 | 32.4% | 0 |
Sheoldred, the Apocalypse | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 16 | 32.1% | 1 |
Duress | Sorcery | 20 | 29.2% | 1 |
Go for the Throat | Instant | 21 | 28.9% | 1 |
Caustic Bronco | Creature — Snake Horse Mount | 6 | 27.9% | 0 |
Deadly Cover-Up | Sorcery | 5 | 26.9% | 0 |
Liliana of the Veil | Legendary Planeswalker — Liliana | 18 | 26.8% | 1 |
Cards that perform better with Hostile Investigator than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mosswood Dreadknight | Creature — Human Knight // Sorcery — Adventure | 2 | 5 | 58.3% | 52.1% | +6.2% |
Duress | Sorcery | 1 | 7 | 62.3% | 56.2% | +6.0% |
Tear Asunder | Instant | 2 | 5 | 58.3% | 53.8% | +4.5% |
Glissa Sunslayer | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Zombie Elf | 3 | 5 | 58.3% | 54.6% | +3.8% |
Go for the Throat | Instant | 2 | 8 | 58.1% | 54.5% | +3.6% |
Tranquil Frillback | Creature — Dinosaur | 3 | 5 | 57.1% | 53.9% | +3.2% |
Liliana of the Veil | Legendary Planeswalker — Liliana | 3 | 8 | 57.6% | 54.8% | +2.9% |
Sheoldred, the Apocalypse | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 4 | 6 | 58.3% | 56.1% | +2.3% |
Cut Down | Instant | 1 | 6 | 56.8% | 55.4% | +1.4% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Golgari Midrange | 16 | 1.8% | 31.6% |
Mono Black | 8 | 47.1% | 15.0% |
Mono Black Demons | 5 | 2.6% | 38.9% |
Jund Midrange | 4 | 44.4% | 25.0% |
Golgari Demons | 3 | 0.6% | 66.7% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.